Let’s be honest: when you hear the word “review,” your brain might immediately conjure up images of soul-sapping PowerPoints, endless meetings, and someone chirping, “Let’s take this offline!” But a Strategic Communication Review isn’t just another box-ticking exercise. Or at least it shouldn’t be. Done right, it’s a game-changer. Think of it as giving your communication function the kind of deep, restorative therapy it deserves. It’s a way to figure out what’s working, what isn’t, and what’s quietly sabotaging your efforts behind the scenes. Whether your team is running like a fine-tuned orchestra or feels more like a pub band that’s forgotten the setlist, a review can transform chaos into clarity. What Is a Strategic Communication Review? In simple terms, a Strategic Communication Review is a comprehensive evaluation of your communication function. It’s like an MOT for your team, tools, and processes, but instead of looking at tyre tread and brake pads, we’re talking about workflows, messaging, and how well you’re connecting with your audiences (both internal and external). It’s a deep dive into the nuts and bolts of your communication efforts, with the ultimate goal of making your team more aligned, efficient, and impactful. And no, it’s not just about finding flaws. A review also celebrates what’s working well and identifies opportunities to do more of it. The hard truth however is that many organisations realise they need a review and reboot of their team when things have gone beyond a few early signs and the rot has set in. Communications is quite a visible function – if it’s not working, it’s relatively easy to see BUT the causes of that disfunction…including the senior leadership culpability in it, are often harder to attribute let alone accept. Why Does a Strategic Communications Review Work? A Strategic Communication Review should be a root and branch review. It should dig into the root causes, providing practical, actionable insights that drive real change. Framed well, i.e. as a way to understand what works, what doesn’t and how to work together to improve, it shouldn’t be a scary prospect for the team. Here’s why it’s so effective:
What Does It Involve? A great Strategic Communication Review should be tailored to your organisation’s specific needs, but here’s what the process usually looks like: 1. Capacity and capability audit Are your team’s size, structure, and skills up to the job? If not, a review will highlight gaps and recommend ways to unlock your team’s full potential. This can look at an operating model or just work to undercover the best way to structure for success and what training needs are urgent. 2. Process and workflow review Think of this as spring cleaning for your operations. From mapping workflows to eliminating bottlenecks, it’s all about making your processes work smarter, not harder. 3. Messaging and content evaluation This step ensures your messaging is clear, consistent, and aligned with your organisational goals. If your content feels more “meh” than “wow,” this is where you’ll fix it. 4. Stakeholder feedback What do your team think of communications in the organisation? What do your audiences really think of the communications offer? A review gathers honest insights from stakeholders (brace yourself!) to help you build stronger, more meaningful relationships. 5. Technology audit Tech tools are great but you can’t automate a bad process. Are your tools helping or hindering? A review identifies whether your tech is pulling its weight - or if it’s time for an upgrade. 6. Cultural analysis Your team’s dynamics play a huge role in communication success. A review dives into morale, collaboration, and trust to strengthen your foundations. What Results Can You Expect? So, what’s in it for you? Here’s what a Strategic Communication Review delivers:
Why Now Is the Time Here’s the thing: if you know something is wrong and need a change, an external and independent review is the way to get the intel to move forward. A review can be a restorative and renewing process.
The longer communication problems fester, the bigger they get. Small inefficiencies snowball. Stakeholders lose patience. And your team? They burn out. A Strategic Communication Review is a vital step to remedy any existing problems and get your team working well again. If your communications are not landing (either internally or externally) or there are obvious problems with structure, capabilities or leadership in a comms team, then a functional review may be on the cards. But be warned. A review of a communications function is the organisational equivalent of going to the dentist - necessary, but not exactly something to look forward to. While it might be a long-overdue opportunity to get things fixed, it will cause challenge and disruption in some quarters. One thing is certain: a Communication Review is a collaborative effort. Everyone involved - senior leaders, comms leaders, team members, and stakeholders - has a part to play. The key to a successful review lies in setting clear expectations upfront, not only of why the review is necessary but what you are expecting from different group of people throughout. For Senior Leaders (Or Those Commissioning)Let’s start at the top. If you’re the one commissioning the review, something’s prompted it: maybe stakeholders complained, or perhaps you’ve noticed that your comms team feels more like a collection of solo performers than a cohesive orchestra. Whatever the reason, here’s what you need to know: 1. Clear the Path Your job is to make the review as smooth as possible. This means giving the reviewers access to the people, data, and resources they need without unnecessary roadblocks. Think of yourself as the host of a dinner party - if the reviewers spend their time navigating red tape, they won’t have time to do the real work. 2. Expect Independence Good reviewers don’t just tell you what you want to hear. They’ll assess the situation honestly and provide recommendations that may challenge the status quo. That’s the point. If you only want affirmation, this probably isn’t the exercise for you. That means you may need to brace to hear some uncomfortable truths. 3. Plan for Action The review doesn’t end with the final report. The recommendations should be seen as a roadmap but it’s only useful if you’re willing to follow it. Plan for a period of implementation after the review, including resources, timelines, and accountability. 4. Timing Matters Expect to receive early findings before the final report. These initial insights can be invaluable for course-correcting quickly, addressing urgent issues or playing in your wider leadership team about what comes next. Key Takeaway: A review isn’t just about diagnosis; it’s about setting the stage for meaningful change. Be prepared to take action. For Comms Leaders Under ReviewIf you’re the comms leader, you might find yourself conflicted. You could be the one commissioning the review - or you could be the person under review. Either way, you’ll need to navigate this with a mix of leadership and humility and that can be tough if there is an element of personal integrity at stake. 1. Be Prepared for Tough Questions Reviewers will ask questions about your processes, leadership style, and team dynamics. This can feel uncomfortable, especially if you suspect you’re part of the problem. But remember, this isn’t about blame - it’s about improvement. Lean in. 2. Balance Leadership and Vulnerability You’ll need to be a leader for your team during this process, reassuring them and encouraging their participation. At the same time, you’ll need to be open to hearing tough truths about your own role in what is not working. 3. Welcome the Reviewers Your attitude sets the tone. If you’re defensive or standoffish, it can make the process harder for everyone. Instead, see the reviewers as partners in making your team better. Key Takeaway: This is an opportunity to lead by example. Be open, collaborative, and willing to face difficult realities. For Comms Teams Under ReviewThe comms team is often where the action happens during a review -and the reactions can vary wildly. Some team members will feel vindicated (“Finally! Someone’s listening!”), while others might worry about what the review will uncover (“They’ll discover I can’t do Social!”) 1. Stay Calm A review isn’t a witch hunt. It’s not about finding scapegoats; it’s about identifying systems, processes and capabilities that need fixing. 2. Get Involved Your input is invaluable. Be honest about what’s working and what isn’t. If you’ve been frustrated by bottlenecks or unclear priorities, now’s your chance to speak up. 3. Expect Change The review will likely lead to changes in how your team operates. Embrace this as an opportunity to work smarter, not harder. Key Takeaway: Your voice matters. Be honest, engaged, and ready to contribute to the solution. For Stakeholders (Internal and External) Whether you’re an internal department head or an external partner, you play a crucial role in shaping the outcomes of the review. 1. Be Open and Honest Your feedback will help the comms team understand how they’re perceived and where they need to improve. Don’t sugar-coat the truth, but be constructive. In many ways communications is everyones job – but there is one department that is charged with making that a reality. 2. Focus on Solutions This isn’t just about pointing out problems (and god knows, if you have been frustrated you’ll want to!) it’s about helping the comms team see where they can add more value without putting the responsibility for all human connection, conversation and communication at their feet. 3. Support the Reset A review is a chance for the comms team to realign and reset. Your honest input can help them get back on track and better serve your needs. Key Takeaway: This is your chance to influence positive change. Speak up and help the comms team improve. Managing Expectations Everyone involved in a Communication Review will have different expectations, different roles to play and different worries. Senior leaders might worry about the cost or complexity of implementation. Comms leaders might feel exposed. Team members might fear blame. Stakeholders might wonder if their feedback will really be heard. The key to managing these expectations is clear communication upfront. Our review team can advise how to do this depending on the situation but it will include defining the parameters of the review, explain its purpose, and reassure everyone that the goal is improvement, not criticism. A Final ThoughtA Communication Review is like a mirror for your communication function -it reflects the good, the bad, and the areas that need work. It’s a process that requires openness, collaboration, and a willingness to change.
If you’re involved in a review, remember: it’s not about who’s at fault. It’s about identifying opportunities for growth and making your team the best it can be. Change is never easy, but it’s always worth it. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |